• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Header Search Widget

Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley

  • News
  • Research
    • Facilities
    • Software
  • Team
    • Our Team
    • Prof. Gollner
    • Join our Team
  • Publications
  • Resources
    • Resources and Links
    • Wildfire Resources
    • Opportunities
    • Recommendations
    • Software
    • Directions and Contact
  • Learning Material

Part II of Paper on Commodity Classification Published in the Fire Safety Journal

June 17, 2011 by admin


Part II of our paper, “Warehouse commodity classification from fundamental principles. Part II: Flame heights and flame spread”, has recently been published in the Fire Safety Journal. The image at the right shows a research approach to the warehouse fire problem. The two smaller scales studied in this work are shown by the dashed box. You can follow a link to the article at: doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.05.002.

Abstract:

In warehouse storage applications, it is important to classify the burning behavior of commodities and rank them according to their material flammability for early fire detection and suppression operations. In this study, a preliminary approach towards commodity classification is presented that models the early stage of large-scale warehouse fires by decoupling the problem into separate processes of heat and mass transfer. Two existing nondimensional parameters are used to represent the physical phenomena at the large-scale: a mass transfer number that directly incorporates the material properties of a fuel, and the soot yield of the fuel that controls the radiation observed in the large-scale. To facilitate modeling, a mass transfer number (or B-number) was experimentally obtained using mass-loss (burning rate) measurements from bench-scale tests, following from a procedure that was developed in Part I of this paper.

Two fuels are considered: corrugated cardboard and polystyrene. Corrugated cardboard provides a source of flaming combustion in a warehouse and is usually the first item to ignite and sustain flame spread. Polystyrene is typically used as the most hazardous product in large-scale fire testing. The nondimensional mass transfer number was then used to model in-rack flame heights on 6.1–9.1 m (20–30 ft) stacks of ‘C’ flute corrugated cardboard boxes on rack-storage during the initial period of flame spread (involving flame spread over the corrugated cardboard face only). Good agreement was observed between the model and large-scale experiments during the initial stages of fire growth, and a comparison to previous correlations for in-rack flame heights is included.

Part I of this paper has also been published in the Fire Safety Journal and can be found at: doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.03.002

Filed Under: Publications

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Students present at Stanford Combustion conference
  • Professor Gollner testifies to Congress
  • Christina Liveretou awarded Onassis Foundation Scholarship
  • Congratulations to Xingyu Ren on the SFPE Student Scholar Award!
  • Prof. Gollner Presents at 2021 UC Wildfire Symposium Series

Michael GollnerFollow5,9772,359

Michael Gollner
Retweet on TwitterMichael Gollner Retweeted
27 Mar

Smoke flow produced by smouldering combustion

Reply on TwitterRetweet on Twitter3Like on Twitter22Twitter
Retweet on TwitterMichael Gollner Retweeted
24 Mar

Units being released.

Sounds like early indications show a lithium ion battery responsible. (Scooter battery most likely)

Reply on TwitterRetweet on Twitter1Like on Twitter7Twitter
22 Mar

Beautiful work by ⁦@Xiaoyu_Ju⁩ & Yuji Nakamura: New Technique Generates Non-Flickering Flames at Normal Gravity and Atmospheric Pressure. I’ve watched this flickering flame development for years and the results have been fascinating

APS Physics

New Technique Generates Non-Flickering Flames at Normal Gravity and Atmospheric Pressure

Flickering flames are more unstable. Researchers have come up with a novel way to keep them still.

www.aps.org

Reply on TwitterRetweet on Twitter1Like on Twitter9Twitter
Load More...
  • Berkeley Engineering
  • UC Berkeley
  • PRIVACY
  • ACCESSIBILITY
  • NONDISCRIMINATION
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • twitter

© 2016–2023 UC Regents   |   Log in